Effects of telephone transmission on the performance of formant-trajectory-based forensic voice comparison female voices.
Zhang, C., Morrison, G.S., Enzinger, E., Ochoa, F. (2013). Speech Communication, 55, 796813.
doi:10.1016/j.specom.2013.01.011
Reliability of human-supervised formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison.
Zhang, C., Morrison, G. S., Ochoa, F., Enzinger E. (2013). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133, EL54EL60.
doi:10.1121/1.4773223
Tutorial on logistic-regression calibration and fusion: Converting a score to a likelihood ratio.
Morrison, G. S. (2013). Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, X, xxxx.
doi:10.1080/00450618.2012.733025
Vowel inherent spectral change in forensic voice comparison.
Morrison, G. S. (2013). In G. S. Morrison & P. F. Assmann (Eds.) Vowel inherent spectral change (pp. 263283). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14209-3_11
The importance of using between-session test data in evaluating the performance of forensic-voice-comparison systems.
Enzinger, E., Morrison, G. S. (2012). Proceedings of the 14th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Sydney (pp. 137140). Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association.
Human-supervised and fully-automatic formant-trajectory measurement for forensic voice comparison Female voices.
Zhang, C., Morrison, G. S., Enzinger, E., Ochoa, F. (2012). Laboratory Report. Forensic Voice Comparison Laboratory, School of Electrical Engineering & Telecommunications, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Stable URL: http://geoff-morrison.net/#_2012LabRepFormants
Response to Draft Australian Standard: DR AS 5388.3 Forensic analysis - Part 3 - Interpretation
Morrison, G. S., Evett, I. W., Willis, S. M., Champod, C., Grigoras, C., Lindh, J., Fenton, N., Hepler, A., Berger, C. E. H., Buckleton, J. S., Thompson, W. C. , González-Rodríguez, J., Neumann, C., Curran, J. M., Zhang, C., Aitken, C. G. G., Ramos, D., Lucena-Molina, J. J., Jackson, G., Meuwly, D., Robertson, B., Vignaux, G. A. (2012).
Stable URL: http://geoff-morrison.net/#_2012DraftStandResp
Stable URL: http://forensic-evaluation.net/australian-standards/#Morrison_et_al_2012
Database selection for forensic voice comparison.
Morrison, G. S., Ochoa, F., & Thiruvaran, T. (2012). Proceedings of Odyssey 2012: The Language and Speaker Recognition Workshop, Singapore, 6277.
Voice source features for forensic voice comparison an evaluation of the Glottex® software package.
Enzinger, E., Zhang, C., & Morrison, G. S. (2012). Proceedings of Odyssey 2012: The Language and Speaker Recognition Workshop, Singapore, 7885.
What did Bain really say? A preliminary forensic analysis of the disputed utterance based on data, acoustic analysis, statistical models, calculation of likelihood ratios, and testing of validity.
Morrison, G. S., & Hoy, M. C. (2012). Proceedings of the 46th Audio Engineering Society (AES) Conference on Audio Forensics: Recording, Recovery, Analysis, and Interpretation, Denver, CO, 203207.
Protocol for the collection of databases of recordings for forensic-voice-comparison research and practice.
Morrison, G. S., Rose, P., & Zhang, C. (2012). Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44, 155167.
doi:10.1080/00450618.2011.630412
The likelihood-ratio framework and forensic evidence in court: A response to R v T.
Morrison, G. S. (2012). International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 16, 129.
doi:10.1350/ijep.2012.16.1.390
-
- Erratum: Table 1, fourth line of numbers should read: “100010 000”, not “10010 000”
Forensic voice comparison using Chinese /iau/.
Zhang, C., Morrison, G.S., & Thiruvaran, T. (2011). Proceedings of the17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, China, 22802283.
Humans versus machine: Forensic voice comparison on a small database of Swedish voice recordings.
Lindh, J., & Morrison, G.S. (2011). Proceedings of the17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Hong Kong, China, 12541257.
Measuring the validity and reliability of forensic likelihood-ratio systems.
Morrison, G.S. (2011). Science & Justice, 51, 9198.
doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2011.03.002
A comparison of procedures for the calculation of forensic likelihood ratios from acoustic-phonetic data: Multivariate kernel density (MVKD) versus Gaussian mixture model - universal background model (GMM-UBM).
Morrison, G.S. (2011). Speech Communication, 53, 242256.
doi:10.1016/j.specom.2010.09.005
An issue in the calculation of logistic-regression calibration and fusion weights for forensic voice comparison.
Morrison, G.S., Thiruvaran, T., & Epps, J. (2010). Proceedings of the 13th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, Melbourne, 7477.
Forensic voice comparison.
Morrison, G.S. (2010). In I. Freckelton, & H. Selby (Eds.), Expert Evidence (Ch. 99). Sydney, Australia: Thomson Reuters.
Estimating the precision of the likelihood-ratio output of a forensic-voice-comparison system.
Morrison, G.S., Thiruvaran, T., & Epps, J. (2010). Proceedings of Odyssey 2010: The Speaker and Language Recognition Workshop, Brno, 6370.
An empirical estimate of the precision of likelihood ratios from a forensic-voice-comparison system.
Morrison, G.S., Zhang, C., & Rose, P. (2011). Forensic Science International, 208, 5965.
doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.11.001
Comparación forense de la voz y el cambio de paradigma.
Morrison, G.S. (2011). CSIC/UIMP Posgrado Oficial en Estudios Fónicos Cuadernos de Trabajo, 1, 138. [Translation by Curiá C. of: Morrison, G.S. (2009). Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift. Science & Justice, 49, 298308.]
Forensic voice comparison and the paradigm shift.
Morrison, G.S. (2009). Science & Justice, 49, 298308.
doi:10.1016/j.scijus.2009.09.002
Comments on Coulthard & Johnson’s (2007) portrayal of the likelihood-ratio framework.
Morrison, G.S. (2009). Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 41, 155161.
doi:10.1080/00450610903147701
A reponse to the UK position statement on forensic speaker comparison.
Rose, P., & Morrison, G.S. (2009). International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 16, 139163.
doi:10.1558/ijsll.v16i1.139
Likelihood-ratio-based forensic speaker comparison using parametric representations of vowel formant trajectories.
Morrison, G.S. (2009). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 23872397.
doi:10.1121/1.3081384
Automatic-type calibration of traditionally derived likelihood ratios: Forensic analysis of Australian English /o/ formant trajectories.
Morrison, G.S., & Kinoshita, Y. (2008). Proceedings of Interspeech 2008 (pp. 15011504). International Speech Communication Association.
Forensic speaker recognition of Chinese /i/ and /y/ using likelihood ratios.
Zhang, C., Morrison, G.S., & Rose, P. (2008). Proceedings of Interspeech 2008 (pp. 19371940). International Speech Communication Association.
Forensic voice comparison using likelihood ratios based on polynomial curves fitted to the formant trajectories of Australian English /aI/.
Morrison, G.S. (2008). International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 15, 249266.
doi:10.1558/ijsll.v15i2.249
Incorrect versions of Figures 3 and 4 were printed in the paper version. These have been corrected in the online vesion.